Re: Renaming .c files to .cc?

Luis Machado <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gdb.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 12/10/19 7:18 PM, Christian Biesinger via gdb wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> I was wondering what people's thoughts are on renaming the .c files to
> .cc, since they are in fact C++ code? (Only for files under gdb/)

I don't have strong objections to this other than it may make things 
slightly more tedious to 'git blame' some files, as Tromey pointed out.

But i think that is excusable compared to better organization of source 
files, for what they really are (C++ files).

> 
> Advantages:
> - Easier for newcomers to see that the code is, in fact, C++
> - Editors will syntax highlight C++ keywords w/o having to be told
> that these files are C++

The above items sound like reasonable pluses.

> 
> On IRC it was mentioned that git may have issues with renames like
> that but I have found that "git log --follow" and such are doing a
> good job with that, at least as long as the same commit doesn't change
> the file too much while it is renamed, which I wouldn't expect to be a
> problem here.
> 
> Thoughts?
> Christian
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.