Re: How to disable GDB backtrace new behavior of including disassembly in backtrace ?

Simon Marchi <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gdb.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2019-12-13 7:09 a.m., William Tambe wrote:
> How to disable GDB backtrace new behavior of including disassembly in
> backtrace ?
> 
> I have built GDB 8.3 and here is an example of output that I now see:
> 
> bt
> #0  0x0005ed42 in set_next_entity (se=<optimized out>,
> cfs_rq=<optimized out>) at /linux/kernel/sched/fair.c:6844
>    0x0005ed38 <pick_next_task_fair+492>:        80 74   li8 %7, 0x4 # 4
>    0x0005ed3a <pick_next_task_fair+494>:        b8 70   add %7, %sp
>    0x0005ed3c <pick_next_task_fair+496>:        ea 37   ld32 %3, %7
>    0x0005ed3e <pick_next_task_fair+498>:        c7 13   cpy %1, %3
>    0x0005ed40 <pick_next_task_fair+500>:        92 10   inc8 %1, 32 # 0x20
> => 0x0005ed42 <pick_next_task_fair+502>:        ea 11   ld32 %1, %1
>    0x0005ed44 <pick_next_task_fair+504>:        ea 50   ld32 %5, %sp
>    0x0005ed46 <pick_next_task_fair+506>:        e0 d0   gip %sr
>    0x0005ed48 <pick_next_task_fair+508>:        a2 d0 4e 00 00 00
>  inc32 %sr, 78 # 0x4e
>    0x0005ed4e <pick_next_task_fair+514>:        d1 1d   jnz %1, %sr
> #1  pick_next_task_fair (rq=<optimized out>, prev=<optimized out>,
> rf=<optimized out>) at /linux/kernel/sched/fair.c:6844
> 
> Using an earlier version of GDB would have just shown two lines
> without disassembly; ie:
> 
> bt
> #0  0x0005ed42 in set_next_entity (se=<optimized out>,
> cfs_rq=<optimized out>) at /linux/kernel/sched/fair.c:6844
> #1  pick_next_task_fair (rq=<optimized out>, prev=<optimized out>,
> rf=<optimized out>) at /linux/kernel/sched/fair.c:6844
> 
> How can I restore the GDB old behavior when using backtrace ?
> 

Hi William,

I have never seen this behavior.  It's either a setting I have never
encountered, or a Python script you have loaded that is providing this
functionality (e.g. with a frame-filter).

Are you able to reproduce this behavior with another program?  If so, could
you send a small reproducer (small source snippet to compile + GDB commands),
we can try it and tell you if we see the same behavior.

Simon
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.