Re: Running programs on aarch64 simulator
Simon Marchi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2020-05-08 12:57 p.m., Joel Sherrill wrote: > On all the elf/eabi targets I have tried over the years, CPU-elf-gcc produced an a.out that was linked with the installed libgloss. I randomly had an sh-elf toolchain laying around and it worked like "sh-elf-gcc m.c" and then both sh-elf-gdb and sh-elf-run could run it on the gdb simulator. > > The aarch64-elf toolchain installs 4 .specs files from libgloss but adding -specs XXX and trying each with the gdb simulator (via aarch64-elf-run) all fail. > > home/joel/test-gcc/install-master/aarch64-elf/lib/aem-validation.specs > /home/joel/test-gcc/install-master/aarch64-elf/lib/aem-ve.specs > /home/joel/test-gcc/install-master/aarch64-elf/lib/nosys.specs > /home/joel/test-gcc/install-master/aarch64-elf/lib/rdimon.specs Ok, I am not familiar with that. Well, it did work for me to build with: $ aarch64-none-elf-gcc test.c -g3 -O0 -o test -specs=nosys.specs I didn't have to provide my own _exit. According to the DWARF info, the _exit now included in my program comes from: /tmp/dgboter/bbs/rhev-vm1--rhe6x86_64/buildbot/rhe6x86_64--aarch64-none-elf/build/src/newlib-cygwin/libgloss/libnosys/_exit.c > > This seems to be an odd case where there is a simulator in the source tree and there is no clear way to use it. Assuming it works. It's also possible to run it directly like this: $ ./sim/aarch64/run gdb/test core: 8 byte write to unmapped address 0xfffffff0 at 0x0 program stopped with signal 11 (Segmentation fault). The result is the same as when I ran it through GDB. I have no idea if it's the sim that is faulty, or the binary needs to be compiled differently. > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () > > > That matches what luck I had on master. I suspect that is a mismatch between > the address map of the simulator and whatever the default linker script does. Perhaps. With the ARM simulator, when I do "starti" in GDB, I see that it starts executing at the ELF file's entry point. With the AArch64 simulator, it starts at 0 (the entry point of the ELF is not 0). So I also suspect that the initial PC is not right. > > I did not push the investigation further. > > > I think Nick may be the key to getting an answer here. Added him in CC, we'll see :). Simon