Re: gdb 8.3: "handler for the OSI ABI "FreeBSD" is not built into this configuration"
Martin Simmons <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
64-bit SPARC is always at least v9. What do the "show osabi" and "set osabi" commands show? Can you run gdb under gdb? I.e. (adjusting the paths as required): gdb/gdb --args gdb/gdb llvm-tblgen llvm-tblgen.core Then use the outer gdb to step through gdbarch_init_osabi and can_run_code_for in the inner gdb to see why none of the gdbarch_info objects match before it prints that warning? You might need to configure gdb with CFLAGS=-g CXXFLAGS=-g to get useful debugging info. __Martin >>>>> On Fri, 22 May 2020 13:35:15 -0600, Chris Nicol said: > > Simon, > > This link: > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/201110DevSummit?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=sparc64_status_201110DevSummit.pdf > > at page 4, "CPU Type" makes me suspicious that v9 does not correctly > characterise my processor. In that same document, there is reference to > support for "UltraSparc, UltraParc III and V9" processors, whereas the > SunBlade 100 I am using is referenced as having an UltrasSparcIIe > processor, which is maybe not "v9"? v9 is possibly something else, such > as UltraSparc III+. There are sparc64-fbsd-nat.o, sparc64-fbsd.tdep.o , > sparc64-nat.o and sparc64-tdep.o object files in my build directory. > > > Chris. > On 5/22/2020 12:51 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: > > On 2020-05-22 2:22 p.m., Chris Nicol wrote: > >> Dear Simon, > >> > >> Thanks for your reply. I went ahead and completed the build of > >> gbd-9.1, which had been the original plan. With the gdb-9.1 > >> executable, I re-ran it against the llvm-tblgen binary and its core > >> dump, with the same result as in gdb-8.3. So this is progress of a > >> sort, I suppose. > >> > >> Taking now the gdb-9.1 and loading gcc9 into the debugger, then > >> "show architecture" yields "The target architecture is set > >> automatically (currently sparc:v9)". The system I am using is based > >> on the 500-MHz UltraSPARC IIe processor. So maybe this setting, > >> sparc:v9, is wrong for this platform? > >> > >> Best wishes, > >> > >> Chris. > > > > I'm not really familiar with sparc machines... does that values sound > > good to you? Does it seem to match the machine you have? > > > > In any case, that seems to match the osabi registration line in > > sparc64-fbsd-tdep.c: > > > > gdbarch_register_osabi (bfd_arch_sparc, bfd_mach_sparc_v9, > > GDB_OSABI_FREEBSD, sparc64fbsd_init_abi); > > > > Is the file sparc64-fbsd-tdep.c being compiled? In other words, does > > the file gdb/sparc64-fbsd-tdep.o exist in your build directory? > > > > Simon > > > > > > >