Re: http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gdb/ down
Joel Brobecker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Wasn't [email protected] converted to a [email protected] alias years ago? > > https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/gdb/2014-11/msg00023.html > > Here, > > https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/gdb/2014-12/msg00001.html > > Sergio said: > > "The GNU sysadmins told me that both lists now redirect here. I hope it works OK." > > > I'm surprised the archives even exist beyond 2014. > > For example, here: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gdb/2016-01/threads.html > > we see an email: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gdb/2016-01/msg00000.html > > that I can't find on the [email protected] archive: > > https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/gdb/2016-01/ > > Did the redirect stop working or something? I just did an experiment, and sent an email to bug-gdb, and got an email back from gdb-owner that it is being held in quarantine waiting for and admin to approve it. So I think the redirection is working, but now the mailing-list settings don't let those through without moderator approval. I was wondering how active the newsgroup might be. One can take a look there: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/gnu.gdb.bug To sumarize: - One post in 2019, with a question and no replies; - Nothing in 2018; - A stream of spam in 2017; - Two posts in 2016, with no answers; - Nothing in 2015; - More activity in 2014. I'm wondering if we shouldn't just ask gnu.org to shut gnu.gdb.bug down. Then we can adapt the mailinglist page on the GDB website accordingly, with a link to the old archives for reference (as long as they are live). -- Joel