Re: sim: replacing ChangeLog files with online git logs
Mike Frysinger via Gdb <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <YE0CqWkmgP897HmE@vapier> |
On 13 Mar 2021 18:38, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 11:26:11 -0500 > > From: Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected], [email protected] > > > > > So people who don't have Git will be left without the logs? I'm not > > > sure I'm okay with that. > > > > what value are people actually pulling from these ? we aren't talking > > about user-focused NEWS, we're talking about developer-focused ChangeLog. > > This has been beaten to death in various forums, including GNU > internal ones. the conclusion was that some people want that, and > some developers are not always on-line and with Git repo handy. the conclusion is that GNU standards made recommendations, but individual projects can pick between them. > > the hard & bikeshed part is what form does the log take. do you just want > > the default `git log` output ? > > There's a Gnulib script which will produce the form that matches the > ChangeLog format. there's actually multiple gnulib scripts. which one are you referring to ? gitlog-to-changelog ? -mike