Re: Backport 037e8112b97 for the 10.x branch
Emil Velikov via Gdb <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACvgo52-+me-dw=E+NxbpZLYxFi7FiZZVbZ+UADkvXoJUqQszg@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Joel, Thanks for the prompt reply On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 17:21, Joel Brobecker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Emil, > > On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 03:00:06PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: > > Greetings Joel, all, > > > > I'd like to nominate a patch for the 10.x branch, in particular > > 037e8112b97 ("[gdb/server] Don't overwrite fs/gs_base with -m32"). > > Since I just missed 10.2 - it would be great if we can have it in the > > next bugfix release. > > We are not planning on doing another 10.x release, so would that > still be useful for you to do? > Yes, it would. > Note that we're started the process of preparing for the GDB 11.1 > release. It's really hard to predict how long it's going to take > before we release, considering that we are a volunteer project, > but I'm hoping a couple of months. > Realising that I'm pushing my luck, I would warmly encourage you to do another 10.x release. Partially due to the severity of the bug - anything built with -m32 is affected - and partially due to how wide-spread the 10.x series is. From a casual look at repology [1] the following distributions are affected and a bunch of them will be "stuck" with the 10.x series. Thus I do think it will be of great benefit in having another 10.x with said fix - even if only this patch is included. List of distributions using GDB 10.x alongside 5.9+ kernel - Alpine, Arch, Debian testing, Fedora 33&34, openSUSE Leap 15.x, Ubuntu 21.04 ... and their respective derivatives. Thanks for your time and dedication improving GDB. -Emil [1] https://repology.org/project/gdb/versions