Re: Proposal to Removal of QNX Neutrino support from GDB

Luis Machado via Gdb <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gdb.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 8/4/21 2:21 PM, Simon Marchi via Gdb wrote:
> On 2021-08-04 11:14 a.m., Stephen Webb wrote:
>> I am still wrestling with internal demons on this, I apologise for the
>> silence.  I should have some basic binutils patches soon as a first step.
> 
> No worries, as long as we get regular updates to know the project is not
> dead.
> 
>> On that topic, are binutils changes handled the same as gdb changes or
>> are they a separate process? The history is very confusing.
> 
> The process is roughly the same, only that the patches are sent to
> [email protected] instead of [email protected].  Also,
> make sure your copyright assignment covers both projects (GDB and
> binutils).
> 
> A small difference in process is that we don't use ChangeLog entries in
> GDB anymore, whereas binutils still uses them.

master binutils has abolished ChangeLogs as well.

https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2021-June/117016.html

Confirmed by H.J. here:

https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2021-August/117591.html
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.