Re: How to create new mi commands via python / get current interpreter in python
Jan Vrany <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 2021-11-02 at 20:11 +0100, Simon Sobisch via Gdb wrote: > That's exactly I was looking for, so sad that this isn't available in > GDB 11 :-( I know... > In any case that looks quite promising, would be nice to see it at > least > in a feature-branch in the official gdb repo until it is ready to be > merged. Good idea, I can do that. I'll post here when done. > > For the "hack without a patched GDB version": do you know of a good > way > to create the mi-expected message with different parameters in plain > python and/or a way to know which interpreter is active in the > current > context of a gdb.Command? > I'm not sure I 100% understand what you want to achieve, but I'm afraid one cannot tell which interprerer was active (as of now). But, if inside python you do "intepreter-exec mi <some custom py command>" you may pass down to the command option - say - `--mi` no? HTH > Simon > > Am 02.11.2021 um 17:56 schrieb Jan Vrany: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, 2021-11-02 at 17:40 +0100, Simon Sobisch via Gdb wrote: > > > Additional to this question: is there an option to create new MI > > > commands from python (instead of "console commands") > > > > Sort of. This has been started by Didier Nadeau and then continued > > by > > me but sadly, I got carried away and have not done the last bits so > > it > > can be pushed. > > > > However, I'm using this feature heavily and keep more-or-less > > up-to-date GDB with this support (and some other hacks/fixes > > waiting > > to be polished and submitted, see > > > > https://github.com/janvrany/binutils-gdb/tree/users/jv%2Fvdb > > > > Here you may find example how I use it: > > > > > > https://swing.fit.cvut.cz/hg/jv-vdb/file/tip/python/vdb/__init__.py#l329 > > > > Let me know if you have any questions, let me know. > > > > I'd like to take the opportunity and apologise to all reviewers > > for not finishing it yet - hopefuly I'll find long-enough period of > > quiter time to finish this. > > > > Jan > > > >