RE: How to get software recording to work?

Hello Simon,

>Thanks Markus for your answers (just in case: they weren't CC'ed to the
>mailing list, not sure if this was by intent).

It was not.  My email client sometimes removes mailing lists when I 'reply all' and I forgot to re-add it.  Thanks for pointing it out.


>> The issue is lack of AVX support in the record full instruction decoder.
>>
>>> Can this recording be done reliably? Which places would need to be fixed
>>> / adjusted to get this working?
>>
>> AFAIK record full also has issues with multi-threaded processes.  To fix the
>instruction decode issue, the best approach IMHO would be to extend the
>instruction decoder that is used for disassembly and use that for record full.
>
>Is this something Intel may have a look at?
>
>I guess Instruction/Processor specific instructions are possibly best
>implemented by the vendors, aren't them?

Intel is maintaining the binutils disassembler.  It is a bit unfortunate that record full uses a separate instruction decoder.

Given the issues with multi-threaded debuggee processes, I'm not sure how usable record full would be.  Or how much it would be used if we were to enable AVX.  I remember it adding significant recording overhead.

Regards,
Markus.
Intel Deutschland GmbH
Registered Address: Am Campeon 10, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de <http://www.intel.de>
Managing Directors: Christin Eisenschmid, Sharon Heck, Tiffany Doon Silva  
Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau
Registered Office: Munich
Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928