Re: Debugging ld.so in gdb
Jacob Kroon via Gdb <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2/7/22 09:36, Jacob Kroon wrote: > Hi Florian, > > On 2/4/22 18:15, Florian Weimer wrote: >> I suspect we are writing beyond the start of the array passed to >> _dl_sort_maps. >> > > It looks like it is writing passed the beginning of the rpo[] array in > _dl_sort_maps_dfs(). The output below is right before the crash happens > (stepping one instruction garbles the backtrace): > >> (gdb) bt >> #0 dfs_traversal (rpo=rpo@entry=0x7fffffffd320, map=0x7ffff7fad590, do_reldeps=do_reldeps@entry=0x0) at dl-sort-maps.c:175 >> #1 0x00007ffff7fd85d4 in dfs_traversal (do_reldeps=0x0, map=<optimized out>, rpo=0x7fffffffd320) at dl-sort-maps.c:143 >> #2 dfs_traversal (rpo=rpo@entry=0x7fffffffd320, map=0x7ffff7fadb70, do_reldeps=do_reldeps@entry=0x0) at dl-sort-maps.c:155 >> #3 0x00007ffff7fd89cd in dfs_traversal (do_reldeps=0x0, map=<optimized out>, rpo=0x7fffffffd320) at dl-sort-maps.c:143 >> #4 _dl_sort_maps_dfs (skip=<optimized out>, for_fini=<optimized out>, nmaps=15, maps=0x7ffff7953de0) at dl-sort-maps.c:233 >> #5 _dl_sort_maps (maps=maps@entry=0x7ffff7953de0, nmaps=nmaps@entry=15, skip=<optimized out>, for_fini=for_fini@entry=false) at dl-sort-maps.c:299 >> #6 0x00007ffff7fcaf0f in _dl_map_object_deps (map=<optimized out>, preloads=<optimized out>, npreloads=<optimized out>, trace_mode=<optimized out>, >> open_mode=<optimized out>) at dl-deps.c:616 >> #7 0x00007ffff7fe6970 in dl_main (phdr=<optimized out>, phnum=<optimized out>, user_entry=<optimized out>, auxv=<optimized out>) at rtld.c:1968 >> #8 0x00007ffff7fe2c7c in _dl_sysdep_start (start_argptr=<optimized out>, dl_main=0x7ffff7fe4bb0 <dl_main>) at ../elf/dl-sysdep.c:264 >> #9 0x00007ffff7fe4678 in _dl_start_final (arg=0x7fffffffdec0) at rtld.c:493 >> #10 _dl_start (arg=0x7fffffffdec0) at rtld.c:587 >> #11 0x00007ffff7fe36a8 in _start () >> (gdb) f 0 >> #0 dfs_traversal (rpo=rpo@entry=0x7fffffffd320, map=0x7ffff7fad590, do_reldeps=do_reldeps@entry=0x0) at dl-sort-maps.c:175 >> 175 **rpo = map; >> (gdb) print *rpo >> $62 = (struct link_map **) 0x7fffffffd238 >> (gdb) f 4 >> #4 _dl_sort_maps_dfs (skip=<optimized out>, for_fini=<optimized out>, nmaps=15, maps=0x7ffff7953de0) at dl-sort-maps.c:233 >> 233 dfs_traversal (&rpo_head, maps[i], do_reldeps_ref); >> (gdb) print &rpo[-1] >> $63 = (struct link_map **) 0x7fffffffd238 > > I inspected the "maps" vector and it containes *multiple* entries to > "libjvm.so", is that allowed ? I wonder if "nmaps" is calculated > correctly, since that determines the array size. Can I verify that somehow ? > Actually that is was not correct. "maps[]->l_name" does not contain any "libjvm.so" at all, but the resulting rpo[] does contain several "libjvm.so" entries. Jacob