Re: Adding binutils to the GNU Toolchain buildbot on sourceware
Luis Machado via Gdb <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel,gmane.comp.gnu.binutils |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 4/25/22 11:43, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > Hi - > >> As a general comment, I think we should have a single buildbot entry for the >> whole of binutils-gdb. > > Perhaps! > >> Given changes to bfd and opcodes can affect gdb, why not build gdb alongside >> the other tools? You don't need to run the gdb testsuite, which should make >> things much more deterministic. > > But this is not an argument for building gdb as a part of testing binutils. > This is an argument for building & testing gdb if binutils changes. > That is: an additional buildbot job An additional buildbot job for gdb/gdbserver would be fine. It's just that a single build for everything is simpler, in my opinion. Is the idea to revive the old buildbot we had for GDB, but for binutils?