Re: Adding binutils to the GNU Toolchain buildbot on sourceware
Thomas Fitzsimmons <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.binutils,gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Mark, Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> writes: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 01:23:44PM +0100, Luis Machado wrote: >> It would make sense to build-test gdb if any of the following changes: > > Thanks, updated the gdb_files list. Also added fedora-x86_64, > debian-armhf, debian-arm64 and fedora-s390 builders. See attached. > > Tom, would it be OK to add a debian-ppc64 builder for gdb? As you can > see in the master.cfg it only does a build of gdb and gdbserver for > now, no tests are run. So it just would make sure that things > build. We'll might add tests later, if we can figure out a sane subset > that should always be green (and won't take more than a couple of > minutes to run). BTW. I am also working on adding more builders for > binutils (gas, ld, binutils) but the current testsuite doesn't seem > clean on anything than latest fedora-x86_64. OK, let's try it. The debian-ppc64 builder has 8 GiB of free disk space. Thomas