Re: The GNU Toolchain Infrastructure Project
Siddhesh Poyarekar <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha,gmane.comp.gdb.devel,gmane.comp.gnu.binutils,gmane.comp.gcc.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2022-10-04 15:05, Mark Wielaard wrote: > I did indeed. Both the proposal and these minutes mention migrating > websites without mentioning any specifics. Knowing which websites are > meant and why they need migration is useful information. > > The FSF tech team is helping us coordinating things on overseers to > help with release archives, mirroring, backups and sourceware > continuity. If this is about migrating websites currently on > www.gnu.org then talking to the FSF tech team does make sense. If it > isn't about that, then we will simply note that and move one. > > We do take this proposal, and all other suggestions people make about > the sourceware infrastructure, seriously, but a lot of details of this > proposal are still unclear. We are trying to get as much details as > possible so we can see how this fits into the current sourceware > roadmap, get a better understanding of the budgetary needs, file > sourceware infrastructure bugs with those details. All to get a better > understanding what the real needs are and document the necessary steps > forward. I had in fact missed the websites mention, sorry I overreacted to your comment. In that case, I don't know if the GNU websites are actually part of this proposal. Sid