Re: The GNU Toolchain Infrastructure Project
Luis Machado via Gdb <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel,gmane.comp.gnu.binutils |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/17/22 13:08, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > On 2022-10-17 07:48, Luis Machado via Binutils wrote: >> On 9/29/22 11:02, Nick Clifton via Binutils wrote: >>> Hi Everyone, >>> >>> On 9/27/22 21:08, Carlos O'Donell via Binutils wrote: >>>> David Edelsohn and I are proud to announce and provide more detail about the >>>> GNU Toolchain Infrastructure project. >>> >>> Just to be clear on my feelings, I believe that the position of the GNU Binutils >>> project should be that we are happy to support the GTI initiative, but we will >>> not be abandoning sourceware either. >>> >>> There will not doubt be some technical issues to work through - arranging to >>> mirror the repositories for example - but I am sure that these can be resolved. >>> >>> Cheers >>> Nick >>> >>> >> >> Binutils is tightly coupled to GDB though (or the other way around). I suppose both projects would >> need to seek agreement on this, otherwise they'd have to be split at some point. > > I couldn't see any follow-up discussion on the gdb mailing list. Have there been discussions elsewhere and is there a direction y'all have some consensus on? > > Sid There have been none to my knowledge. And no consensus either.