Re: Is there an option to "silent-step"/ "silent-next" (possibly in python and/or mi)?
Philippe Waroquiers via Gdb <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At least some of the output is discarded: (gdb) alias wwww = | next | cat > /dev/null (gdb) n 33 for (int i = 0; i < MAX/3; i++) (gdb) wwww (gdb) Philippe On Sun, 2023-02-12 at 07:46 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote: > Philippe> As a (not very clean) bypass, you might do something like: > Philippe> alias silent-next = | next | grep -e some_regexp_to_see what_you_are_interested_in > Philippe> and if you want to see nothing: > Philippe> alias silent-next = | next | cat > /dev/null > > I'm not completely sure but I think some of the inferior-control > commands work in a way that circumvents this. At least, IIRC, there's a > bug open about not being able to capture this output using > gdb.execute(to_string=True). > > Tom