Re: Running gdb-14.0.50

Nemo Nusquam via Gdb <[email protected]> writes:

> I downloaded gdb-14.0.50.20230322 and built it with the following
> configuration script.
>
> ABI=64 \

No need for this unless you're using in-tree gmp/mpfr.

> CFLAGS='-m64 -g3 -O0' \
> CXXFLAGS='-m64 -g3 -O0' \

I've asked this before: why do you need a gdb with full debug info?  If
running into problems, start with a bare-minimum configuration,
i.e. omit CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS completely.  If your gcc doesn't create 64-bit
binaries by default, better use CC='gcc -m64' CXX='g++ -m64'.

> SHELL=/usr/bin/bash \

If you really need another shell during the build (although the Solaris
11.3 /bin/sh, which is ksh93, should be good enough), specify
CONFIG_SHELL instead.

> AR=/usr/bin/gar \

No need for this: the build should be fine with either Solaris ar or GNU
ar.  If it's not, please file a bug report.

> AS=/usr/bin/as \

Again: not used in the gdb build (and not the best way for gcc,
either).  Omit.

> --host=sparcv9-sun-solaris11 \
> --build=sparcv9-sun-solaris11 \

Here's your problem: this is a triple gdb knows nothing about, thus the
error when starting.  The real thing is called sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11
(i.e. 2.11 instead of 11) and it's admittedly quite unfortunate that
config.guess doesn't get this right on its own.  Just specify
--build=sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11; the other two (host and target) are set
implicitly from that.

> --enable-64-bit-bfd \
> --enable-tui \
> --with-curses \

I never had a need for any of those.  If you do, please explain.

> --disable-bootstrap \

Again: gcc only; omit.

> Despite specifying both host and build as sparcv9, when I invoke against a
> simple C binary, the following happens.
>
> ../../gdb-14.0.50.20230322/gdb/arch-utils.c:753: internal-error:
> initialize_current_architecture: Selection of initial architecture failed
> A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
>
> Is there any other option that will specify a build for sparcv9 alone.  No
> other architecture will be debugged on this machine (T2000 running Solaris
> 11.3).

Use the correct triple (and omit anything not strictly necessary) and
you should be fine.

	Rainer

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University