Re: Problems interrupting remote target on powerpc
Luis Machado via Gdb <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 4/28/23 12:25, Chris Packham wrote: > > > On Fri, 28 Apr 2023, 9:41 PM Luis Machado, <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > On 4/28/23 10:38, Chris Packham wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 28 Apr 2023, 9:19 PM Luis Machado, <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: > > > > On 4/28/23 10:14, Chris Packham via Gdb wrote: > > > On Thu, 27 Apr 2023, 4:55 PM Chris Packham, <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: > > > > > >> Hi GDB, > > >> > > >> I've had a few users report to me issues with interrupting a running > > >> process after continuing when attached to a remote gdbserver running > > >> on a powerpc target. Everything seems to work properly on arm and > > >> aarch64 so there might be some powerpc or big-endian specific issue > > >> lurking. > > >> > > >> The gdbserver version we're currently using is from gdb-11.2 built > > >> from source and most users have gdb-multiarch 12.1 from ubuntu 22.04 > > >> (some might still be using gdb-multiarch 10.2 from a PPA). > > >> > > >> Does this ring any bells for anyone? I'm going to try and get hold of > > >> a powerpc target to test with to see if I can reproduce it for myself. > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Chris > > >> > > > > > > Did some digging of my own I can report that indeed things aren't working > > > well for powerpc. I tried updating gdbserver to 12.1 and 13.1. 12.1 was > > > much the same as 11.2. 13.1 reported that it was unable to send sigkill > > > when processing the interrupt command. 13.1 also seems not to be able to > > > respond to the 'info os processes' command from the gdb client > > > > > >> > > > > What sort of behavior/output do you see? > > > > > > I'll capture some proper output when I'm back in the office but basically once I 'continue' I can't get the gdb prompt back with Ctrl+C. > > > > Is it a tight loop by any change? Or is gdb trapped in a long sequence of instruction-steps? > > > It's a daemon using a g_main_loop() not sure if that counts as a tight loop. GDB shouldn't be doing any stepping. I'll also give a process that runs and finishes when I get a chance to see if there are issues with that. > Got it. It would be useful to see some of the output with "set debug remote 1" and "set debug remote-packet-max-chars -1". It may indicate what's going on.