Re: Problems interrupting remote target on powerpc
Luis Machado via Gdb <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 5/1/23 06:30, Chris Packham wrote: > On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 1:02 AM Luis Machado <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 4/28/23 12:25, Chris Packham wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Fri, 28 Apr 2023, 9:41 PM Luis Machado, <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> On 4/28/23 10:38, Chris Packham wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > On Fri, 28 Apr 2023, 9:19 PM Luis Machado, <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: >>> > >>> > On 4/28/23 10:14, Chris Packham via Gdb wrote: >>> > > On Thu, 27 Apr 2023, 4:55 PM Chris Packham, <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: >>> > > >>> > >> Hi GDB, >>> > >> >>> > >> I've had a few users report to me issues with interrupting a running >>> > >> process after continuing when attached to a remote gdbserver running >>> > >> on a powerpc target. Everything seems to work properly on arm and >>> > >> aarch64 so there might be some powerpc or big-endian specific issue >>> > >> lurking. >>> > >> >>> > >> The gdbserver version we're currently using is from gdb-11.2 built >>> > >> from source and most users have gdb-multiarch 12.1 from ubuntu 22.04 >>> > >> (some might still be using gdb-multiarch 10.2 from a PPA). >>> > >> >>> > >> Does this ring any bells for anyone? I'm going to try and get hold of >>> > >> a powerpc target to test with to see if I can reproduce it for myself. >>> > >> >>> > >> Thanks, >>> > >> Chris >>> > >> >>> > > >>> > > Did some digging of my own I can report that indeed things aren't working >>> > > well for powerpc. I tried updating gdbserver to 12.1 and 13.1. 12.1 was >>> > > much the same as 11.2. 13.1 reported that it was unable to send sigkill >>> > > when processing the interrupt command. 13.1 also seems not to be able to >>> > > respond to the 'info os processes' command from the gdb client >>> > > >>> > >> >>> > >>> > What sort of behavior/output do you see? >>> > >>> > >>> > I'll capture some proper output when I'm back in the office but basically once I 'continue' I can't get the gdb prompt back with Ctrl+C. >>> > >>> >>> Is it a tight loop by any change? Or is gdb trapped in a long sequence of instruction-steps? >>> >>> >>> It's a daemon using a g_main_loop() not sure if that counts as a tight loop. GDB shouldn't be doing any stepping. I'll also give a process that runs and finishes when I get a chance to see if there are issues with that. >>> >> >> Got it. It would be useful to see some of the output with "set debug remote 1" and "set debug remote-packet-max-chars -1". It may indicate what's going on. > > So things get a bit stranger. I tried to replicate my problem using a > busybox applet (cat /dev/zero) but I was able to Ctrl-C and continue > multiple times. Here's a snippet of debug doing that > > (gdb) cont > Continuing. > [remote] Sending packet: $Z0,100040e0,4#d0 > [remote] Packet received: OK > [remote] Sending packet: $Z0,10036bb8,4#0c > [remote] Packet received: OK > [remote] Sending packet: $Z0,1003ae68,4#0e > [remote] Packet received: OK > [remote] Sending packet: $Z0,778e5770,4#f4 > [remote] Packet received: OK > [remote] Sending packet: $vCont;c:p63a8.-1#e0 > [remote] wait: enter > [remote] wait: exit > ^C[remote] pass_ctrlc: enter > [remote] interrupt: enter > [remote] interrupt: exit > [remote] pass_ctrlc: exit > [remote] wait: enter > [remote] Packet received: T0201:7fa61a50;40:0fde67f0;thread:p63a8.63a8;core:2; > [remote] wait: exit > [remote] Sending packet: $qXfer:threads:read::0,1000#92 > [remote] Packet received: l<threads>\n<thread id="p63a8.63a8" core="2" > name="cat" handle="7792e040"/>\n</threads>\n > > Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt. > [remote] Sending packet: $z0,100040e0,4#f0 > [remote] Packet received: OK > [remote] Sending packet: $z0,10036bb8,4#2c > [remote] Packet received: OK > [remote] Sending packet: $z0,1003ae68,4#2e > [remote] Packet received: OK > [remote] Sending packet: $z0,778e5770,4#14 > [remote] Packet received: OK > [remote] Sending packet: $mfde67f0,4#ff > [remote] Packet received: 7c000026 > [remote] Sending packet: $mfde67ec,4#31 > [remote] Packet received: 44000002 > [remote] Sending packet: $mfde67f0,4#ff > [remote] Packet received: 7c000026 > [remote] Sending packet: $mfde67ec,4#31 > [remote] Packet received: 44000002 > 0x0fde67f0 in __GI___libc_write ([remote] Sending packet: $m7fa61a40,40#27 > [remote] Packet received: > 000000017fa61ab800001000000010007fa61a700002d002fffff00000000000100078287fa61ab87fa61ab8000000017fa61a90100078287792e5c800000000 > [remote] Sending packet: $g#67 > [remote] Packet received: > 000000047fa61a50779355c00000001e7fa61ab800001000000010000fde66c00002d002fffff000000000007fa61a9024002444100a8668000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000077931b78100040e0000000000000000100000003100a000000000000000010000fef37e4000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000fff80000000000000000000000000000000000000000000200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000020080000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000080000000000fde67f00002d902240424420fef37 e40fde615000000000000000000000000100000c00 > [remote] Sending packet: $m10007828,4#67 > [remote] Packet received: 2c030000 > [remote] Sending packet: $m10007824,4#63 > [remote] Packet received: 480556bd > [remote] Sending packet: $m10007828,4#67 > [remote] Packet received: 2c030000 > [remote] Sending packet: $m10007824,4#63 > [remote] Packet received: 480556bd > [remote] Sending packet: $m7fa61a80,40#2b > [remote] Packet received: > 000000017fa61ab800000000000010007fa61ab010006b2c0000000000000000000110000000000000001000010000007fa62ae01000683c0000000000000000 > fd=0x1e, fd@entry=0x1, buf=buf@entry=0x7fa61ab8, > nbytes=nbytes@entry=0x1000) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/write.c:26 > 26 in ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/write.c > > Now attempting the same thing on a running daemon > > (gdb) attach 1285 > Attaching to program: <redacted>/usr/sbin/modbusd, process 1285 > [remote] Sending packet: $vAttach;505#a0 > [remote] Packet received: T0001:7fc44e50;40:0f69ec74;thread:p505.505;core:2; > [remote] packet_ok: Packet vAttach (attach) is supported > [remote] Sending packet: $qXfer:exec-file:read:505:0,1000#b3 > [remote] Packet received: l/usr/sbin/modbusd > [remote] Sending packet: $qC#b4 > [remote] Packet received: QCp505.505 > [remote] Sending packet: $Hgp505.505#81 > [remote] Packet received: OK > ... lots of output skipped > [remote] Packet received: l<threads>\n<thread id="p505.505" core="2" > name="modbusd" handle="77a7a520"/>\n<thread id="p505.511" core="1" > name="gmain" handle="77a3b3a0"/>\n<thread id="p505.512" core="1" > name="modbusd" handle="7723a3a0"/>\n<thread id="p505.514" core="1" > name="rpc.8" handle="76a393a0"/>\n<thread id="p505.515" core="1" > name="cmat:global" handle="75eff3a0"/>\n<thread id="p505.516" core="1" > name="cmsr:events" handle="756fe3a0"/>\n<thread id="p505.517" core="1" > name="cmbc:modbusd-dy" handle="74efd3a0"/>\n<thread id="p505.58c" > core="1" name="rpc.9" handle="742ff3a0"/>\n</threads>\n > [New Thread 1285.1297] > [New Thread 1285.1298] > [New Thread 1285.1300] > [New Thread 1285.1301] > [New Thread 1285.1302] > [New Thread 1285.1303] > [New Thread 1285.1420] > > Thread 1 "modbusd" stopped. > [remote] Sending packet: $mf69ec74,4#d5 > [remote] Packet received: 7c000026 > [remote] Sending packet: $mf69ec70,4#d1 > [remote] Packet received: 44000002 > [remote] Sending packet: $mf69ec74,4#d5 > [remote] Packet received: 7c000026 > [remote] Sending packet: $mf69ec70,4#d1 > [remote] Packet received: 44000002 > 0x0f69ec74 in __GI___poll ([remote] Sending packet: $m7fc44e40,40#2e > [remote] Packet received: > 7fc44e700000000077a8cb78100035707fc44e700000000800000001ffffffff10031fb0000000080f92609c100358207fc44eb00f834ca8ffffffff7fffffff > [remote] Sending packet: $g#67 > [remote] Packet received: > 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 5c0f87c49c200000008202400010031fb000000c00 > [remote] Sending packet: $mf834ca8,4#ce > [remote] Packet received: 7c7b1b78 > [remote] Sending packet: $mf834ca4,4#ca > [remote] Packet received: 4e800421 > [remote] Sending packet: $mf834ca8,4#ce > [remote] Packet received: 7c7b1b78 > [remote] Sending packet: $mf834ca4,4#ca > [remote] Packet received: 4e800421 > [remote] Sending packet: $m7fc44e80,40#32 > [remote] Packet received: > 7fc44e90000000010f92609c1003582077a8ba88000000007fc451fc7fc45214100358d8100358d40f92609c100358d07fc44ed00f835274880024847fc45214 > fds=0x10031fb0, nfds=0x8, timeout=0xffffffff) at > ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/poll.c:29 > 29 ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/poll.c: No such file or directory. > (gdb) cont > Continuing. > [remote] Sending packet: $Z0,77a40770,4#e7 > [remote] Packet received: OK > [remote] Sending packet: $vCont;c:p505.-1#78 > [remote] wait: enter > [remote] wait: exit > ^C[remote] pass_ctrlc: enter > [remote] interrupt: enter > [remote] interrupt: exit > [remote] pass_ctrlc: exit > > I think one of the key differences is the fact that the 2nd process I > connected to has multiple threads. I'm not sure if I've got another > (on-busybox) daemon that doesn't use threads. That's interesting. I wonder if this reproduces with a top-of-tree gdbserver? GDB seems to be doing the expected here, sending the ctrl+c over. gdbserver might be getting things wrong, or it didn't manage to interrupt the target.