Re: gdb and ancient GNU autotools

Tom Tromey <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gdb.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Pinski via Gdb <[email protected]> writes:

Andrew> Yes they have not updated to 2.70 or 2.72 yet. But with a complex
Andrew> build system as GCC/binutils/gdb, why update to something if it is
Andrew> working.

I don't fully agree with this approach.  There's a benefit to upgrading
periodically, which is that it may ease future upgrades -- including
when one is really needed.  It's kind of like rebasing, where if you let
a branch sit for too long, suddenly you're in trouble.

That said, the upgrades are kind of a pain (I did one of them in the past).
So, it can be hard to motivate to do them; and given the slow pace of
auto* development, there's not often a need to rush into it.

Tom
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.