Re: gdb and ancient GNU autotools
Tomasz Kłoczko via Gdb <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABB28CwCmesnSmecvv=Pdpzx+bXirA4uV+zyHyiVB-NH9Ms6qQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 at 20:44, Tomasz Kłoczko <[email protected]> wrote: [..] > *If no one will try to continue libtool maintenance* atractor anchored in > libtool will be changing those metrics with time in ONLY ONE DIRECTION > which will be ONLY more and more affecting gcc, binutils, gdb trio. > Only after pressing the "send" button some additional thought bounced back in my head .. In gcc, binutils, gdb trio ALREADY is not used OOTB litool and effectively in those projects source trees effectively are maintained libtool fork!!!😳 If time on maintaining that tool is already part of those projects development, why not officially fork it to have 100% control with less hassles on syncing necessary files across subtrees?🤔 kloczek -- Tomasz Kłoczko | LinkedIn: http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH