Re: Sourceware mitigating and preventing the next xz-backdoor

Joel Sherrill <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gdb.devel,gmane.comp.gcc.devel,gmane.comp.gnu.binutils,gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha
Message-ID <CAF9ehCVOBkcckhQVimfgCQBh7=EE9f_7y-7+YoWicCp=CjHUqA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024, 3:09 AM Florian Weimer via Gdb <[email protected]>
wrote:

> * Guinevere Larsen via Overseers:
>
> > Beyond that, we (GDB) are already experimenting with approved-by, and
> > I think glibc was doing the same.
>
> The glibc project uses Reviewed-by:, but it's completely unrelated to
> this.  Everyone still pushes their own patches, and there are no
> technical countermeasures in place to ensure that the pushed version is
> the reviewed version.
>

Or that there isn't "collusion" between a malicious author and reviewer.
Just tagging it approved or reviewed by just gives you two people to blame.
It is not a perfect solution either.

But double checking and checklists are good practices. They are not
foolproof if some bad actor is determined enough.

--joel



> Thanks,
> Florian
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.