Re: Patches submission policy change

Hi Jonathan,

On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 01:32:11PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely via Gdb wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, 22:36 Mark Wielaard, <[email protected]> wrote:
> > wrt to the mailinglists maybe getting larger patches, I think most
> > will still be under 400K and I wouldn't raise the limit (because most
> > such larger emails are really just spam). But we might want to get
> > more mailinglist moderators.
> >
> > gcc-patches, binutils and gdb-patches all have only one moderator
> > (Jeff, Ian and Thiago). It would probably be good if there were
> > more.
> >
> > Any volunteers? It shouldn't be more than 1 to 3 emails a week
> > (sadly most of them spam).
> 
> I'm happy to help moderating/spambusting for the GCC lists.

I see you are already doing that for the libstdc++ mailinglist, but
you are the only moderator. Maybe you want someone as backup there?

The jit mailinglist is the same. It only has one moderator
(David). Having a second/backup one would probably be nice. Are you ok
to be added there?

(I see that both the libstdc++ and jit mailinglist just allow up to
5MB patches, which probably means they don't block any legitimate
ones, but might get a bit more spam than necessary).

It isn't a patches mailinglist, so slightly less urgent, but the
gcc-help mailinglist doesn't have any moderators. Would you be willing
to help out with that one?

Thanks,

Mark