Re: Updated Sourceware infrastructure plans
Simon Marchi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha,gmane.comp.gcc.devel,gmane.comp.gnu.binutils,gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2024-04-23 11:08, Tom Tromey wrote: >> Indeed. Though Patchwork is another option for patch tracking, that >> glibc seem to be having success with. > > We tried this in gdb as well. It was completely unworkable -- you have > to manually clear out the patch queue, meaning it's normally full of > patches that already landed. I know glibc has success with it, but I > wouldn't consider it for gdb unless it gained some new abilities. The thing that Gerrit excels at is tracking the different versions of a given patch, being able to easily diff versions, etc. And then mark a patch as merged once it's committed to master. Patchwork doesn't have this capability built-in (AFAIK). You can try to do some automation, but I doubt that any system based solely on getting patches from a mailing list can ever be as good as something like Gerrit for this. Simon