Re: Updated Sourceware infrastructure plans

Ian Lance Taylor <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha,gmane.comp.gcc.devel,gmane.comp.gnu.binutils,gmane.comp.gdb.devel
Message-ID <CAKOQZ8wW5BfMu1hOJaQHeHTgfnbEGM7a2v1Rw9BkALdo5QtTyw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 11:48 PM Richard Biener
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> We'd only know for sure if we try.  But then I'm almost 100% sure that
> having to click in a GUI is slower than 'nrOK^X' in the text-mode mail UA
> I am using for "quick" patch review.  It might be comparable to the
> review parts I do in the gmail UI or when I have to download attachments
> and cut&paste parts into the reply.  It might be also more convenient
> for "queued" for review patches which just end up in New state in either
> inbox.

Gerritt does not require clicking in a GUI, though that is of course
the more widely used option.  Patches can be approved from the command
line.


> But then would using gitlab or any similar service enforce the use of
> pull requests / forks for each change done or can I just continue to
> post patches and push them from the command-line for changes I
> can approve myself?

Gerritt permits submitting patches from the command line for people
who can self-approve.


> Btw, for any forge like tool I'd even consider there'd be the requirement
> that _all_ functionality is also accessible via a documented (stable) API,
> aka there's command-line tooling available or at least possible to write.

True of Gerritt.

Ian
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.