Re: Sourceware @ Conservancy - Year One
Maxim Kuvyrkov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha,gmane.comp.gcc.devel,gmane.comp.gnu.binutils,gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On May 29, 2024, at 23:02, Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sourceware joined Conservancy as member project on May 15 2023. > https://sfconservancy.org/news/2023/may/15/sourceware-joins-sfc/ > > It was a busy year and we would like to give an overview of various > topics. > > - Communications > - New and updated services > - Security > - New and upgraded hardware > - Finances > - Next year plans > - Conclusion > > = Communications > > In the last year we organized 12 Open Office meetings on IRC. > > And posted Sourceware infrastructure community quarterly updates for > 23Q2 https://inbox.sourceware.org/[email protected] > 23Q3 https://inbox.sourceware.org/[email protected] > 23Q4 https://inbox.sourceware.org/[email protected] > 24Q1 https://inbox.sourceware.org/[email protected] > > We also published the Sourceware 25 Roadmap. Preparing Sourceware for > the next 25 years. https://sourceware.org/sourceware-25-roadmap.html > > Various members of the Sourceware Project Leadership Committee and > Conservancy staff attended the GNU Tools Cauldron in 2023 and FOSDEM > in 2024 to meet in person. > > The Software Freedom Conservancy extended the use of their Big Blue > Button instance https://bbb.sfconservancy.org/ to Sourceware projects > that want to host video meetings. > > And Sourceware joined the fediverse at @[email protected] > https://fosstodon.org/@sourceware > > = New and updated services > > https://snapshots.sourceware.org/ > > Thanks to OSUOSL we now have a snapshots server to publish static > artifacts from current git repos created in isolated containers. > It can be used as alternative to git hooks or cron jobs to generate > snapshots for things like: > > glibc code and manual snapshots: > https://snapshots.sourceware.org/glibc/trunk/latest/ > GNU poke code and doc snapshots: > https://snapshots.sourceware.org/gnupoke/trunk/latest/ > elfutils code coverage: > https://snapshots.sourceware.org/elfutils/coverage/latest/ > libabigail website, manuals and api docs: > https://snapshots.sourceware.org/libabigail/html-doc/latest/ > Valgrind snapshots and manuals: > https://snapshots.sourceware.org/valgrind/trunk/latest/ > DWARF draft spec: > https://snapshots.sourceware.org/dwarfstd/dwarf-spec/latest/ > GDB code snapshots: > https://snapshots.sourceware.org/gdb/trunk/latest/src/ > Binutils code snapshots: > https://snapshots.sourceware.org/binutils/trunk/latest/src/ > > The container files and build steps are defined through the builder > project. > > The Software Heritage project https://www.softwareheritage.org/ > started archiving the active git repos and the (historic) subversion > and cvs archives. This is in addition to the mirrors at SourceHut > https://sr.ht/~sourceware/ > > Email. No more From rewriting for patches mailinglists. > Sourceware mailinglists used From rewriting. No more! We upgraded > mailman, gave up subject prefixes, mail footers, html stripping and > reply-to mangling. > > This includes the libc-alpha and gcc-patches mailinglists. The gcc > patches lists for libstdc++, libgccjit, fortran and gcc-rust. And the > lists for projects that use patchwork, newlib, elfutils, libabigail > and gdb. > > Thanks to the FSF tech-team for walking us through their setup for > lists.gnu.org > > https://inbox.sourceware.org/ now also "handles" HTML emails (by > stripping the HTML part) and was reindexed to include any missing > (HTML) emails. > > Various projects were still creating their project homepages from > CVS. We upgraded both glibc and binutils to have a public git htdocs > repository now to which the whole community can contribute. > > https://sourceware.org/cgit/binutils-htdocs/ > https://sourceware.org/cgit/glibc-htdocs/ > > And a special thanks to ARM who have been using > https://patchwork.sourceware.org/ to provide a pre-commit testing > service for various projects. Hi Mark, Thanks for the great update! Minor nitpick: pre-commit testing for AArch64 and AArch32 architectures is provided by Linaro Toolchain Working Group (Linaro TCWG). -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > > = Security > > Sourceware introduced gitsigur for protecting git repo integrity. With > comparisons, developer workflow examples and composition possibilities > for gitsigur, b4 and sigstore. > https://inbox.sourceware.org/ZJ3Tihvu6GbOb8%[email protected]/ > > Sourceware now also allows signed git pushes > (in addition to signed git commits). > > The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) system seems broken and > has been issuing more and more questionable advisories. Various hosted > projects have been writing security policies to help users know which > bugs might have security implications. > > https://sourceware.org/cgit/elfutils/tree/SECURITY > https://sourceware.org/cgit/binutils-gdb/tree/binutils/SECURITY.txt > https://gcc.gnu.org/cgit/gcc/tree/SECURITY.txt > > The glibc project even setup their own security mailing list and CNA > (CVE Numbering Authority) publishing their own advisories: > https://sourceware.org/glibc/security.html > https://sourceware.org/cgit/glibc/tree/advisories > > To double check that generated files in source repositories are really > what was intended the container builders now have an autotools > generated files checker, autoregen, for gcc, binutils and gdb: > https://inbox.sourceware.org/[email protected]/ > > Sourceware hosts were not affected by the xz-backdoor. But we did > reset the https://builder.sourceware.org containers of debian-testing, > fedora-rawhide and opensuse-tumbleweed. These containers however > didn't have ssh installed, were running on isolated VMs on separate > machines from our main hosts, snapshots and backup servers. > > We introduced an "aging inactive users" policy. Accounts are now > automatically disabled when not used for a year (after a warning). > https://inbox.sourceware.org/overseers/[email protected] > > = New and upgraded hardware > > There have been complaints about overloaded builders on > https://builder.sourceware.org. So OSUOSL have provided us with > another arm64 and x86_64 server. The new servers do the larger gcc and > glibc builds so the other builders can do quicker (smaller) CI builds > without having to wait on the big jobs. > > StarFive has donated 4 VisionFive-2 RISC-V boards with 8GB, 4-core > JH7110 supporting the RV64GC ISA for https://builder.sourceware.org/ > Which has allowed us to setup CI (and try) builders for various > projects: annobin, binutils(+try), bzip2, debugedit, dwz, > elfutils(+try), glibc, gdb, poke, and libabigail(+try). > > One of the drives in server2 broke down. It was part of a 10 drive > raid6 setup, which can take 2 bad disks before full failure. We also > have a full mirror on server3, which has a similar raid6 setup. We > ordered 3 new disks, one as replacement for the bad disk and a spare > for server2 and server3 in case of future drive failures. The drive > has been replaced and everything is running smoothly again. > > Thanks to Red Hat server2 got a RAM upgrade to 512G. > > = Finances > > To create a hardware replacement fund we setup > https://sourceware.org/donate.html > > There were $5.500+ in individual donations in the last year. > > And Valgrind was picked for a FUTO https://futo.org Microgrant, which > has been donated to Sourceware through the Software Freedom > Conservancy for maintaining and expanding the infrastructure for > Valgrind and other core toolchain and developer tool projects. > FUTO then doubled their contribution to $2.000. > > Thanks to our hardware and services partners we didn't have much > direct expenses. We spend ~$300 on the replacement disks and $20 on > domain registration. > > Total income was $7,611.73, total expenses were $321.76. > Note that income is after currency conversions and administration costs. > > Which leaves us with $7,289.97 for our current hardware replacement fund. > > = Next year plans > > To prepare for next year we held various open office and public email > discussions with the community and made plans for Sourceware and the > hosted projects secure software development frameworks. > > https://inbox.sourceware.org/[email protected] > https://inbox.sourceware.org/[email protected] > https://inbox.sourceware.org/[email protected] > > After the xz-backdoor incident obviously a lot of discussions focused > on various security aspects. The Sourceware Project Leadership > Committee turned those ideas into concrete plans for next year: > > Secure Sourceware Project Goals > https://sourceware.org/sourceware-security-vision.html Secure > > More isolation of existing services. Modernizing account > processes. Release upload process improvements. Hardware keys for > administrators, release managers and developers. Pull-request > server. Part time junior system administrator. > > We are currently working with the Conservancy to fund these plans. > > = Conclusion > > This first year as a Conservancy Member Project has been really good > for Sourceware and we hope to continue the relationship for many years > to come. We urge the community to support the Software Freedom > Conservancy by becoming a Conservancy Sustainer > https://sfconservancy.org/sustainer