Re: DCO: Was: Re: Contributing to gdb
Guinevere Larsen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.binutils,gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 6/17/24 12:00 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 5:23 AM Guinevere Larsen via Gdb > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Just a heads up, too, if your patch isn't a trivial fix, you might need >> to sign a bit of paperwork giving the copyright of changes to GDB to the >> Free Software Foundation before we are able to accept the changes. I >> mention this up front because I know a few people who were turned off by >> the idea, even though the process itself isn't complicated. > I just noticed that GDB (and binutils) are currently not accepting > DCO's like both glibc > (https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Contribution%20checklist#Copyright_and_license) > and GCC (https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#legal) are now accepting. > Has there been any talk about accepting DCOs for gdb and binutils? Or > has this not been brought up yet? I haven't heard of it yet, every time I see a new contributor with a patch accepted, the copyright assignment is always the way everyone uses, and it has stalled the last release. I for one would absolutely love if we could use a quick DCO line instead of current process. -- Cheers, Guinevere Larsen She/Her/Hers > > Thanks, > Andrew > >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guinevere Larsen >> She/Her/Hers >>