Re: DCO: Was: Re: Contributing to gdb

Guinevere Larsen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.binutils,gmane.comp.gdb.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 6/17/24 12:00 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 5:23 AM Guinevere Larsen via Gdb
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Just a heads up, too, if your patch isn't a trivial fix, you might need
>> to sign a bit of paperwork giving the copyright of changes to GDB to the
>> Free Software Foundation before we are able to accept the changes. I
>> mention this up front because I know a few people who were turned off by
>> the idea, even though the process itself isn't complicated.
> I just noticed that GDB (and binutils) are currently not accepting
> DCO's like both glibc
> (https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Contribution%20checklist#Copyright_and_license)
> and GCC (https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#legal) are now accepting.
> Has there been any talk about accepting DCOs for gdb and binutils? Or
> has this not been brought up yet?

I haven't heard of it yet, every time I see a new contributor with a 
patch accepted, the copyright assignment is always the way everyone 
uses, and it has stalled the last release.

I for one would absolutely love if we could use a quick DCO line instead 
of current process.

-- 
Cheers,
Guinevere Larsen
She/Her/Hers

>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guinevere Larsen
>> She/Her/Hers
>>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.