RFC: Deprecate the ARM simulator
Nick Clifton via Gdb <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Guys, I would like to deprecate or even delete the ARM simulator. Although I am listed as the maintainer for the sim, I have not made any improvements to it for years and it is completely unable to handle modern ARM cores. The only updates to the sources in the last few years have been to fix compilation issues, and basically it has bit-rotted away. It is not entirely clear to me how a sim target should be deprecated. I am attaching a patch that shows one possible method - adding code to the sim/configure.ac file to indicate that the target is deprecated. An alternative would be to add the sim target to the noconfigdirs list that is constructed in the top level configure.ac file. Although I think that that list is for components that do not support the target at all, rather than components where the target is deprecated. Anyway, thoughts, comments, suggestions ? Cheers Nick
sim.configure.ac.patch
(text/x-patch, 834 B)
diff --git a/sim/configure.ac b/sim/configure.ac
index fad5b71ee59..e9ec6e70efc 100644
--- a/sim/configure.ac
+++ b/sim/configure.ac
@@ -84,6 +84,18 @@ m4_define([SIM_TARGET], [dnl
AM_CONDITIONAL([SIM_ENABLE_ARCH_$2], [${sim_enable_arch_$2}])
])
+case $target in
+ arm*-*-* | \
+ null)
+ if test "x$enable_obsolete" != xyes; then
+ echo "*** Configuration $targ is obsolete." >&2
+ echo "*** Specify --enable-obsolete to build it anyway." >&2
+ echo "*** Support will be REMOVED in the next major release of GDB," >&2
+ echo "*** unless a maintainer comes forward." >&2
+ exit 1
+ fi;;
+esac
+
dnl WHEN ADDING ENTRIES TO THIS MATRIX:
dnl Make sure that the left side always has two dashes. Otherwise you can get
dnl spurious matches. Even for unambiguous cases, do this as a convention, else