Re: On pull request workflows for the GNU toolchain

Eric Gallager <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha,gmane.comp.gcc.devel,gmane.comp.gnu.binutils,gmane.comp.gdb.devel,gmane.comp.gcc.fortran
Message-ID <CAMfHzOuV9JiGjBXksa-9fKwLSwPfN1UbqXH7wnNxO6LzJnyiWg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 8:09 AM Thomas Koenig via Gcc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> [For the fortran people: Discussion on gcc@]
>
> Just a general remark.
>
> There are people, such as myself, who regularly mess up
> their git repositories because they have no mental model
> of what git is doing (case in point: The Fortran unsigned
> branch, which I managed to put into an unrepairable state
> despite considerable help from people who tried to help me
> fix it).

As one such person who has messed up his fork of GCC, I'd just like to
note that in my particular case at least, I messed it up because I was
trying to apply GitHub's model for git usage, while the GCC project
has a very different model for git usage, and the two don't exactly
play very well with one another. I see switching to a pull request
model as reducing the chances of people getting their forks into
unusable states, rather than increasing it.

> This is especially true of volunteer maintainers,
> who are still the mainstay of gfortran.
>
> Whatever you end up doing, consider such maintainers, and
> if they still can contribute or would simply give up.
> If what you end up doing is too complicated, it may end up
> severely impacting the gfortran project (and possibly others).
>
> Best regards
>
>         Thomas
>
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.