Re: DCO: Was: Re: Contributing to gdb
Luis Machado via Gdb <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, On 6/23/24 23:06, Tom Tromey wrote: >>> I just noticed that GDB (and binutils) are currently not accepting >>> DCO's like both glibc >>> (https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Contribution%20checklist#Copyright_and_license) >>> and GCC (https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#legal) are now accepting. >>> Has there been any talk about accepting DCOs for gdb and binutils? Or >>> has this not been brought up yet? > > If gcc, glibc, and binutils accept it, then IMO gdb should as well. > > Tom Bumping this thread. I noticed there was a mention of aligning gcc/glibc/binutils in terms of DCO text. That made me wonder where we stand regarding DCO for gdb [1], and if we really want to stray from the other toolchain projects by not making a decision on whether we accept it or not. [1] https://inbox.sourceware.org/binutils/[email protected]/