Re: automated coding style tool

Tom Tromey <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gdb.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>>>>> Aktemur, Tankut Baris via Gdb <[email protected]> writes:

> Regarding the automated coding style tool: is there any active attempt
> to pursue this goal?

Every year or two I take another look at clang-format.
The discussion is here:

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30098

> Tom mentioned his t/clang-format branch in that email thread.  I checked
> the branch.  The clang-format config file has
>   # BasedOnStyle:  GNU
> Is the GDB coding style so off from the built-in GNU style
> that it cannot be reused?

I don't recall why I commented this out.  Anyway clang-format doesn't
come very close to GNU style.  I'd be ok with ignoring most of the
little differences (i.e., I don't care about goto label placement), but
the bin packing output is just super ugly some of the time.

Tom
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.