Re: bugzilla keyword for beginner issues to work on
Guinevere Larsen via Gcc <[email protected]> Tue, 30 Sep 2025 08:22:08 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.devel,gmane.comp.gdb.devel,gmane.comp.gnu.binutils,gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 9/30/25 6:04 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Tue, 30 Sept 2025 at 09:39, Dhruv Chawla via Gcc <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 30/09/25 13:19, Sam James via Gcc wrote: >>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments >>> >>> >>> Andrew Pinski <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> As talked about during the GNU tools cauldron, the gdb and gcc >>>> keywords usage here are different but folks mentioned it would be a >>>> good idea to have the same between the 2 bugzilla instances. Right now >>>> gcc is easyhack while gdb uses good-first-bug. Both have issues with >>>> the naming of each. >>> 'good-first-*' is what people tend to search for in other >>> projects. Having it aligned (and optimising for new contributors) makes >>> sense, I think. >>> >>>> [...] >>> sam >> +1 to this. I feel like "beginner-improvement" and "easyhack" are harder to >> parse than "good-first-bug" or "good-first-issue" (which LLVM uses FWIW), and >> it is not immediately obvious to me what either of them mean. > Yeah, I really don't care that somebody might decide to work on a > "good first issue" as their second or third issue. It would still a > good first one for somebody else, it just happens to be that person's > second or third. > > "beginner-improvement" is too long, and I had the same question as > Florian about who or what is being improved. > I am not a fan of easy-hack, and I find good-first-bug mentally longer because it is one more word (even if fewer characters). However, I don't really mind how wordy it is because bugzilla can autofill the options based on the partial typing, so I don't care about wordiness I like beginner-improvement and I'm fine with good-first-bug. If would-be contributors are already searching for one, we should definitely standardize on the one that is already searched (or at least match the beginning). I'll try to see if I can look up what kernel, QEMU and other systems engineering projects use. -- Cheers, Guinevere Larsen It/she