Re: tclint, pre-commit and patch submissions
Guinevere Larsen <[email protected]> Wed, 1 Oct 2025 09:30:43 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.patches,gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/1/25 8:55 AM, Tom de Vries wrote: > Hi, > > I've recently added a tclint pre-commit hook, and started cleaning the > testsuite. > > The current status is that all gdb.* dirs are done, with the exception > of gdb.stabs (which is going to be removed, so I skipped it). > > My question is what to do with patches adding new test-cases or > modifying existing test-cases. > > If these patches are not tclint-clean, then after commit this command: > ... > $ pre-commit run tclint --all-files > ... > will start showing new tclint errors. > > One thing that could be done at that point is to ask the > submitter/committer to fix the tclint errors. > > But there's no formal agreement atm that this need to be fixed. I've > proposed the hook, and Tom Tromey approved it, but that's just two > maintainers. I think using a linter is good, and making new submissions clean for that linter is something worthwhile. IMO, when approving a patch, we could just mention the TCL lint output as nits to be fixed before a patch is pushed. > > So I'd like to know the opinion of other maintainers. > > Possible outcomes of this discussion could be that: > - we get rid of tclint in pre-commit and forget about it > - we drop one or more error categories in gdb/tclint.toml > - we require submitters to run pre-commit before submission > - we make the repo refuse commits that are not pre-commit clean > - nothing changes, and submitters can use all/some/no pre-commit hooks > for their own submissions > > Thanks, > - Tom > -- Cheers, Guinevere Larsen It/she