Re: [EXT] Re: gdb does not stop at printf for ppc
Peter Bergner via Libc-help <libc-help-9JcytcrH/[email protected]> Thu, 2 Oct 2025 10:57:22 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.glibc.user,gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha,gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Fixing Carl's email. It seems his old address doesn't work anymore.
>> On 9/25/25 2:47 AM, Sachin Monga wrote:
>>>
>>> There is a test case in GDB where printf is getting converted into
>>> __printfieee128 when program is compiled with "--no-builtin" flag.
>>> The program is working fine on a machine with glibc 2.34, but not on
>>> another machine where glibc 2.40 is installed.
> On 01/10/25 01:03, Peter Bergner via Libc-help wrote:
>>
>> There is actually a GLIBC bugzilla about this and it's not just printf,
>> but all IEEE 128-bit floating point functions. I've assigned it to you now! :-)
>> I don't remember if the solution in Carl's last comment was actually decided
>> to be the correct way to "fix" this though:
>>
>> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29989
On 10/1/25 12:20 PM, Adhemerval Zanella Netto wrote:
> This is not only an issue for IBM float128 support, but rather for other places
> that we use asm alias (for instance 64 bit time support on some 32 bits abis,
> fortify support for some symbols that route to _chk variants, etc.).
Ok, it's an even bigger problem than we thought. I'm surprised no one
else has hit this before us.
> And I think Carl's suggestion might work [1], with the following:
>
> ---
> diff --git a/sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm-compat/ieee128-printf.c b/sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm-compat/ieee128-printf.c
> index 7b1640ceac..d567d98c68 100644
> --- a/sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm-compat/ieee128-printf.c
> +++ b/sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm-compat/ieee128-printf.c
> @@ -33,3 +33,6 @@ ___ieee128_printf (const char *format, ...)
> return done;
> }
> strong_alias (___ieee128_printf, __printfieee128)
> +
> +asm (".local printf\n"
> + ".set printf, __printfieee128");
> ---
>
> Breaking point at printf does work:
>
> ---
> $ cat printf.c
> #include <stdio.h>
>
> int main (int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> printf ("%La\n", 1.2345L);
> }
> $ powerpc64le-glibc-linux-gnu-gcc -mabi=ieeelongdouble printf.c -o printf
> $ gdb -ex 'set breakpoint pending on' -ex 'b printf' -ex 'r' ./tst-printf-ieeelongdouble
> [...]
> Breakpoint 1.2, 0x00007ffff7c92528 in ___ieee128_printf (format=format@entry=0x100000d88 "%La\n") at ../sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm-compat/ieee128-printf.c:24
> 24 {
> ---
>
> I don't think we have a better solution, attribute (alias) requires the
> target symbol to be pre-defined (which would require to reestructure how
> the long double alias as done); nor I think the compiler will be able to
> easy synthesize it because afaiu this need to done at the TU of the
> alternative implementation.
Ok, this is promising and yeah, is what Carl and Uli suggested.
That said, their comment from the bugzilla:
The new redirected symbols need to be dynamic symbols in case only
the stripped binary is available.
Does your solution work if you strip your test case?
Peter