Re: Problems building gdbserver in binutils 2.46

On 09.02.2026 15:52, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Feb 09 2026, Jan Beulich via Gdb wrote:
> 
>> Doesn't this point at a (long-standing) regression in how branching is done?
>> Up to 2.24 gdb*/ weren't part of the branches, hence such an issue couldn't
>> arise.
> 
> It is only present in the repository, but never in the tarball.

Well, yes, hence I said "on the branches". I'm puzzled by that, as I'd expect
the tarballs to represent the branches at the respective tags.

Jan