Re: Does gdb debuginfod download libc etc.?
Simon Marchi via Gdb <[email protected]> Mon, 9 Mar 2026 11:36:00 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 3/9/26 9:57 AM, Paul Smith wrote: > On Sun, 2026-03-08 at 22:32 -0400, Simon Marchi wrote: >> I noticed a difference between the first debuginfod call (which >> succeeds) and the second one (that fails). The first one is >> debuginfod_find_executable and the second is >> debuginfod_find_debuginfo. Could it be important? > > I think this is not an issue. > >> Are you able to replicate those queries using the debuginfod-find CLI >> tool? This is equivalent to the first query, I would expect it to >> work: >> >> debuginfod-find executable f87c1d8cd2118209ef2350b22b187a64d705d6cd > > This is the build ID for my program, and this exists and is downloaded > properly. > >> And this is equivalent to the second query, I would expect it to >> fail: >> >> debuginfod-find debuginfo 8cfa19934886748ff4603da8aa8fdb0c2402b8cf > > This is the build ID for the debuginfo for my local system's runtime > linker /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2: Ah ok, I didn't catch that from your output, sorry. >> [separate-debug-file] find_separate_debug_file_by_buildid: end: >> looking for separate debug info (build-id) for /lib64/ld-linux-x86- >> 64.so.2 debuginfod_find_debuginfo >> 8cfa19934886748ff4603da8aa8fdb0c2402b8cf > > This doesn't exist in my debuginfod server. It might be nice to have > debuginfo for the runtime linker, but I've never had it for any of my > debugging sessions, because users very rarely install it on their > systems, and it's not been a problem. > > Even if I wanted the debuginfo for the runtime linker, things have > already gone awry here because GDB is loading my LOCAL SYSTEM'S runtime > linker, when instead it should have downloaded the core file's runtime > linker which is a different file with a different build ID. > >>>> ⚠️ warning: platform-specific solib_create_inferior_hook did not >>>> load initial shared libraries. >> >> GDB still ends up listing the shared libs, so it might be red >> herring. It is still curious though. > > The reason I suggest this might be related is that it seems to me that > once we reach this point, GDB has already started to do the wrong > thing. For example as above, it's use the local system's ld-linux.so > rather than downloading the core file's ld-linux.so. > > I would expect that I would see requests to the debuginfod server for > the shared libraries, including the runtime linker itself, but I don't > see any of that. It only tries to find the executable and the > debuginfo file for the local system's runtime linker, and it never > tries to find anything else. I would add a printf in core_target::build_file_mappings to print the mapped files and their (if present) build-ids. And then put a breakpoint or printf in solib_bfd_open, to see when GDB tries to open the files for the solibs. It might be that we blindly open the files from the host, and we could add some build-id checks to avoid that (and ask debuginfod instead). > It would be interesting if Arsen can repeat his (successful) > experiment, setting the DEBUGINFOD_VERBOSE=9 environment variable > first, so we can see where in the processing of GDB startup we should > expect to be seeing debuginfod requests. > >> What OS are you on (I want to know which of the solib-*.c >> implementations you are using)? > > I'm not sure what you mean by "OS" here; I'm on GNU/Linux x86-64 (as > can be seen from the name of my runtime linker :)). If you mean the > distribution, my local host is Ubuntu 22.04 LTS and the core file was > generated on, I believe, Red Hat EL 9. Yeah sorry, it was late. > I have built GDB from source, so I'm happy to add any debugging info or > run GDB itself inside GDB, if someone can point me to likely places to > look. It would be useful to add debug prints to corelow.c, where it reads the mappings, and then in solib-svr4.c, where it tries to open the solibs. I am of the opinion that if adding some debug prints helps you troubleshoot a problem, then it is worth adding these debug prints upstream, since they could help somebody else (or even you) in the future. Simon