Re: Nominations for Anthropic’s Claude for Open So urce program
Andrew Pinski <[email protected]> Fri, 12 Jun 2026 16:11:44 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha,gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+=Sn1k0Ooe96oKt3fbm9R2CVwzF3spdGh-A3N-YEjac+zSi_w@mail.gmail.com> |
--00000000000063b6fd0654169a28 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 12, 2026, 4:07=E2=80=AFPM Adhemerval Zanella Netto < [email protected]> wrote: > > > On 12/06/26 16:29, Andrew Pinski wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2026, 12:19=E2=80=AFPM Carlos O'Donell <[email protected]= om > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Developers, > > > > Anthropic is generously offering 6 months of Claude Max 20x to Free > and Open > > Source Software projects to support the FOSS ecosystem. These tools > can be > > incredibly helpful with reviewing upstream code, evaluating the > conformance of > > a particular interface to a standard, or just for your own learning > and > > exploring the implementation of the project or subsystem. > > > > If you are an established, active contributor to the GNU Toolchain > and are > > interested in having access to Claude Max 20x under Anthropic=E2=80= =99s > Claude for Open > > Source program, please respond to this email thread with a short > description of > > how you would utilize the access and the potential impact on the GN= U > Toolchain. > > The program's slots are limited and David Edelsohn and I plan to > review the > > proposals. Please keep in mind that these are individual grants fro= m > Anthropic > > to you personally. If you are approved you=E2=80=99ll get an email = from > Anthropic with > > further instructions. > > > > While the current GNU Project policy is not to accept LLM-generated > content in > > the projects, that still leaves other uses like bug triage, patch > review, and > > research as ways to use these tools. > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > Carlos. > > > > P.S. This is not an endorsement of Anthropic, Claude or LLMs. We > dislike > > having to say it, but please don=E2=80=99t use this thread as a pla= tform to > express > > your personal opinions about the companies or about AI=E2=80=99s im= pact on > the world. > > > > > > Dont send out emails like this in the first place then. > > > > Also note coverity has been offering similar services for code coverage > and static analysis for years now. But there was no notice like that sent > out for this. Why try to push llm when static analysis does the same? > > > gnulib guys seem to be experimenting with LLM for patch review recently > [1], > and it has uncovered real regressions [2]. And I recall that their > experience with Coverity has been subpar [3], and I think they even > started > disregarding it. > > Personally, I see value in adding an LLM to the patch review phase, > especially > since we lack manpower and initial triage can help newcomers and uncover > some > issues. > All of this talk about llm and llm reviews is off-topic for this list. Including the original email is off-topic and should not have been sent. Carlos, Can you step down from the llm gcc working group for this email since it shows a conflict of interest of prompting one product. Plus it shows poor taste of sending out an email about a non free product to a mailing list about glibc development. Can I also ask you to step down from CoC for violating the CoC here? Thanks, Andrea > > > > [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2026-06/msg00016.html > [2] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2026-06/msg00037.html > [3] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2019-05/msg00059.html > --00000000000063b6fd0654169a28 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"auto"><div><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote gmail_quote_contai= ner"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Fri, Jun 12, 2026, 4:07=E2=80= =AFPM Adhemerval Zanella Netto <<a href=3D"mailto:adhemerval.zanella@lin= aro.org">[email protected]</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote = class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid= ;padding-left:1ex"><br> <br> On 12/06/26 16:29, Andrew Pinski wrote:<br> > <br> > <br> > On Fri, Jun 12, 2026, 12:19=E2=80=AFPM Carlos O'Donell <<a href= =3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"noreferrer">carlos@r= edhat.com</a> <mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_bl= ank" rel=3D"noreferrer">[email protected]</a>>> wrote:<br> > <br> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Developers,<br> > <br> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Anthropic is generously offering 6 months of Claude= Max 20x to Free and Open<br> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Source Software projects to support the FOSS ecosys= tem. These tools can be<br> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0incredibly helpful with reviewing upstream code, ev= aluating the conformance of<br> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0a particular interface to a standard, or just for y= our own learning and<br> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0exploring the implementation of the project or subs= ystem.<br> > <br> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0If you are an established, active contributor to th= e GNU Toolchain and are<br> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0interested in having access to Claude Max 20x under= Anthropic=E2=80=99s Claude for Open<br> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Source program, please respond to this email thread= with a short description of<br> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0how you would utilize the access and the potential = impact on the GNU Toolchain.<br> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0The program's slots are limited and David Edels= ohn and I plan to review the<br> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0proposals. Please keep in mind that these are indiv= idual grants from Anthropic<br> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0to you personally. If you are approved you=E2=80=99= ll get an email from Anthropic with<br> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0further instructions.<br> > <br> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0While the current GNU Project policy is not to acce= pt LLM-generated content in<br> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0the projects, that still leaves other uses like bug= triage, patch review, and<br> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0research as ways to use these tools.<br> > <br> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0--<br> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Cheers,<br> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Carlos.<br> > <br> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0P.S. This is not an endorsement of Anthropic, Claud= e or LLMs. We dislike<br> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0having to say it, but please don=E2=80=99t use this= thread as a platform to express<br> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0your personal opinions about the companies or about= AI=E2=80=99s impact on the world.<br> > <br> > <br> > Dont send out emails like this in the first place then.<br> > <br> > Also note coverity has been offering similar services for code coverag= e and static analysis for years now. But there was no notice like that sent= out for this. Why try to push llm when static analysis does the same?<br> <br> <br> gnulib guys seem to be experimenting with LLM for patch review recently [1]= ,<br> and it has uncovered real regressions [2]. And I recall that their <br> experience with Coverity has been subpar [3], and I think they even started= <br> disregarding it.<br> <br> Personally, I see value in adding an LLM to the patch review phase, especia= lly <br> since we lack manpower and initial triage can help newcomers and uncover so= me <br> issues.<br></blockquote></div></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D= "auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">All of this talk about llm and llm revie= ws is off-topic for this list. Including the original email is off-topic an= d should not have been sent.</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"a= uto">Carlos,</div><div dir=3D"auto">=C2=A0 Can you step down from the llm g= cc working group for this email since it shows a conflict of interest of pr= ompting one product.=C2=A0 Plus it shows poor taste of sending out an email= about a non free product to a mailing list about glibc development.=C2=A0<= /div><div dir=3D"auto">Can I also ask you to step down from CoC for violati= ng the CoC here?</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Thanks,= </div><div dir=3D"auto">Andrea</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D= "auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><div class=3D"gmail_quote gmail_quote_co= ntainer"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;borde= r-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br><br><br> <br> [1] <a href=3D"https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2026-06/msg000= 16.html" rel=3D"noreferrer noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.gnu.= org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2026-06/msg00016.html</a><br> [2] <a href=3D"https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2026-06/msg000= 37.html" rel=3D"noreferrer noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.gnu.= org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2026-06/msg00037.html</a><br> [3] <a href=3D"https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2019-05/msg000= 59.html" rel=3D"noreferrer noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.gnu.= org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2019-05/msg00059.html</a><br> </blockquote></div></div></div> --00000000000063b6fd0654169a28--