Re: Nominations for Anthropic’s Claude for Open Source program
Sam James <[email protected]> Sat, 13 Jun 2026 02:15:55 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha,gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Gentoo |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Collin Funk <[email protected]> writes: > Adhemerval Zanella Netto <[email protected]> writes: > >> gnulib guys seem to be experimenting with LLM for patch review recently = [1], >> and it has uncovered real regressions [2]. And I recall that their=20 >> experience with Coverity has been subpar [3], and I think they even star= ted=20 >> disregarding it. >> >> Personally, I see value in adding an LLM to the patch review phase, espe= cially=20 >> since we lack manpower and initial triage can help newcomers and uncover= some=20 >> issues. > > I don't have access to Gnulib's coverity, but GNU coreutils shows a lot > of Gnulib stuff anyways. My feeling is that it is useful, but one has to > do some work to filter out perfectly legitimate code (e.g., the coverity > machine complains about type limit comparisons which may be different on > less common platforms). > This is a common sentiment I hear with Coverity. Generally useful but need people to do the work on reviewing findings and keep on top of that. > I don't disagree that LLM review is useful. However, I do want to state > my *personal* opinions here as I did in that Gnulib thread. Anthropic > (and OpenAI, which has a similar program) tend to play this program up > to show how altruistic and great they are. However, the 6 month limit > makes it seem like a strategic plan to gain future subscribers. It appears that it's also not some specific offer they've made to our community: https://claude.com/contact-sales/claude-for-oss and https://www.anthropic.com/claude-for-oss-terms. I think it unfortunately acts as advertising. I am sure that was not the intent but it seems to be the effect nonetheless :( > [...] sam --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEBBAEWCgCpFiEEJaa7iN2bdkxrVUHCc4QJ9SDfkZAFAmosr0wbFIAAAAAABAAO bWFudTIsMi41KzEuMTIsMiwyXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25z Lm9wZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQyNUE2QkI4OEREOUI3NjRDNkI1NTQx QzI3Mzg0MDlGNTIwREY5MTkwDxxzYW1AZ2VudG9vLm9yZwAKCRBzhAn1IN+RkKj/ AQDQnjTmz1OPn4/vQO5OE8AGIaH/grMKPSCwaeBFQ2sp6AD+M42raB1NwTUGqaVV VtuNp2FvgtWkTMb1pvR3YuPuFQ0= =onLe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--