Re: RFC: prototype of C extensions using the Python limited API

Matthieu> The prototype is organized as follows:
Matthieu> - include/
Matthieu>   - py-ref.hpp: copied from GDB. Addition of a clear() method in gdbpy_ref_policy.

Do we really need this?

What if gdb_py_ref is a subclass that adds a custom method instead?

I still haven't really read the code.  It's kind of difficult in this
form.

Matthieu>     + gdbpy_heap_type: generic logic for dynamically-allocated types
Matthieu>     (tp_traverse, tp_clear, tp_dealloc)

I don't understand why these can't just be methods of the implementation
class, by which I mean the subclasses of PyObject.  If needed we could
make an intermediary base class that interposes between the
implementation and PyObject like

struct intermediary : public PyObject {};
struct type_object : public intermediary { ... };  // eg

Matthieu> I don't expect a thorough review of all the code, but a
Matthieu> validation of the approach.

I'll try to send more next week.


Tom