gdb in inline functions

icegood <[email protected]> Mon, 24 May 2010 10:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gdb.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Why gdb sssso ugly when has deal with inline functions? 

Warning:
Cannot insert breakpoint 2.
Error accessing memory address 0x115: Input/Output error.

Why rather gcc so ugly with them? Why you just not substitute inlining with
non-inlining ones but with different names overriding 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_mangling Name mangling 
when you just compile with -g/-ggdb  or like this???

Like you did before overriding breakpoints for template functions? And no
linker errors while compiling!
-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/gdb-in-inline-functions-tp28659355p28659355.html
Sent from the Gnu - gdb - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.