Re: [PATCH v3] gdb: align siginfo_t with the Linux kernel definition

Luis <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gdb.patches
Message-ID <CANnS9rtqu91-KENRU2+PF-LO4hbsLWQ4x-QFZ6Vg5sMDzGOBMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Matthieu,

Bear with me as I go through this one and I can share some feedback/updates.

On Tue, Jul 21, 2026, 10:19 Matthieu Longo <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 08/07/2026 16:54, Matthieu Longo wrote:
> > On 02/07/2026 17:52, Matthieu Longo wrote:
> >> GDB's current definition of siginfo_t is missing many fields present in
> >> the Linux kernel definition [1].
> >>
> >> These fields are useful for providing detailed, user-friendly
> diagnostics
> >> when a fault occurs. Some new AArch64 extensions, such as Permission
> >> Overlay Enhancement used to implement Protection Keys [2], require the
> >> debugger to inspect 'si_pkey' alongside 'si_addr' to help the user
> identify
> >> the problematic key.
> >>
> >> This patch aligns GDB's definition of the __sifields._sigfault member of
> >> siginfo_t with the definition from the Linux kernel master branch.
> >>
> >> [1]:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/
> >>      tree/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h#n69
> >> [2]:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> > Ping
>
> Hi Thiago,
>
> Please can you advise ?
> I haven't manage to get any approval from maintainers up until now.
>
> Matthieu
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.