Re: [PATCH v3] gdb: align siginfo_t with the Linux kernel definition

Luis <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Jul 2026 22:09:45 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gdb.patches
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 02/07/2026 17:52, Matthieu Longo wrote:
> GDB's current definition of siginfo_t is missing many fields present in
> the Linux kernel definition [1].
> 
> These fields are useful for providing detailed, user-friendly diagnostics
> when a fault occurs. Some new AArch64 extensions, such as Permission
> Overlay Enhancement used to implement Protection Keys [2], require the
> debugger to inspect 'si_pkey' alongside 'si_addr' to help the user identify
> the problematic key.
> 
> This patch aligns GDB's definition of the __sifields._sigfault member of
> siginfo_t with the definition from the Linux kernel master branch.
> 
> [1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/
>       tree/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h#n69
> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> 
> Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <[email protected]>
> ---
>   gdb/linux-tdep.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/linux-tdep.c b/gdb/linux-tdep.c
> index a7381677498..d5b0e6e7011 100644
> --- a/gdb/linux-tdep.c
> +++ b/gdb/linux-tdep.c
> @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ linux_get_siginfo_type (struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
>     struct type *void_ptr_type;
>     struct type *uid_type, *pid_type;
>     struct type *sigval_type, *clock_type;
> -  struct type *siginfo_type, *sifields_type;
> +  struct type *siginfo_type, *sifields_type, *sigfault_union_type;
>     struct type *type;
>   
>     linux_gdbarch_data = get_linux_gdbarch_data (gdbarch);
> @@ -285,11 +285,21 @@ linux_get_siginfo_type (struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
>     type_allocator alloc (gdbarch);
>   
>     const struct builtin_type *builtin_types = builtin_type (gdbarch);
> +  struct type *short_type = builtin_types->builtin_short;
>     struct type *int_type = builtin_types->builtin_int;
>     struct type *uint_type = builtin_types->builtin_unsigned_int;
>     struct type *long_type = builtin_types->builtin_long;
> +  struct type *unsigned_long_type = builtin_types->builtin_unsigned_long;
> +  struct type *uint32_type = builtin_types->builtin_uint32;
>   
>     void_ptr_type = lookup_pointer_type (builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_void);

Nit: Blank line here for cleanliness.

> +  /* Compute padding length, i.e. __ADDR_BND_PKEY_PAD.  */
> +  unsigned alignof_void_ptr = type_align (void_ptr_type);
> +  unsigned padding_size = (alignof_void_ptr < sizeof(short)

Logic: Are we mixing host-side sizeof (short) with target-side 
type_align (void_ptr_type) here?

Formatting: Space between sizeof and parens. Multiple cases of this one.

> +			   ? sizeof(short)
> +			   : alignof_void_ptr);
> +  struct type *addr_bnd_pkey_padding_type
> +    = init_vector_type (builtin_types->builtin_uint8, padding_size);
>   
>     /* sival_t */
>     sigval_type = arch_composite_type (gdbarch, NULL, TYPE_CODE_UNION);
> @@ -364,9 +374,41 @@ linux_get_siginfo_type (struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
>     append_composite_type_field (type, "si_stime", clock_type);
>     append_composite_type_field (sifields_type, "_sigchld", type);
>   
> -  /* _sigfault */
> +  /* Begin _sigfault's anonymous union.  */
> +  sigfault_union_type = arch_composite_type (gdbarch, NULL, TYPE_CODE_UNION);
> +  /* used on alpha and sparc */
> +  append_composite_type_field (sigfault_union_type, "si_trapno", int_type);
> +  /* used when si_code=BUS_MCEERR_AR or used when si_code=BUS_MCEERR_AO */

Nit: Odd phrase. Maybe rewrite as...

"used when si_code is BUS_MCEERR_AR or BUS_MCEERR_AO"

> +  append_composite_type_field (sigfault_union_type, "si_addr_lsb", short_type);
> +
> +  /* used when si_code=SEGV_BNDERR */
> +  type = arch_composite_type (gdbarch, NULL, TYPE_CODE_STRUCT);
> +  append_composite_type_field (type, "_dummy_bnd", addr_bnd_pkey_padding_type);
> +  append_composite_type_field (type, "si_lower", void_ptr_type);
> +  append_composite_type_field (type, "si_upper", void_ptr_type);
> +  append_composite_type_field (sigfault_union_type, "_addr_bnd", type);
> +
> +  /* used when si_code=SEGV_PKUERR */
> +  type = arch_composite_type (gdbarch, NULL, TYPE_CODE_STRUCT);
> +  append_composite_type_field (type, "_dummy_pkey", addr_bnd_pkey_padding_type);
> +  append_composite_type_field (type, "si_pkey", uint32_type);
> +  append_composite_type_field (sigfault_union_type, "_addr_pkey", type);
> +
> +  /* used when si_code=TRAP_PERF */
> +  type = arch_composite_type (gdbarch, NULL, TYPE_CODE_STRUCT);
> +  append_composite_type_field (type, "si_perf_data", unsigned_long_type);
> +  append_composite_type_field (type, "si_perf_type", uint32_type);
> +  append_composite_type_field (type, "si_perf_flags", uint32_type);
> +  append_composite_type_field (sigfault_union_type, "_perf", type);
> +
> +  /* End _sigfault's anonymous union.  */
> +
> +  /* _sigfault is set by SIGILL, SIGFPE, SIGSEGV, SIGBUS, SIGTRAP, SIGEMT */
>     type = arch_composite_type (gdbarch, NULL, TYPE_CODE_STRUCT);
>     append_composite_type_field (type, "si_addr", void_ptr_type);
> +  /* Since there is no possibility to declare an anonymous union,
> +     using '_' instead.  */
> +  append_composite_type_field (type, "_", sigfault_union_type);

Could we name this in a better way? Simply using _ is a bit strange.

>     append_composite_type_field (sifields_type, "_sigfault", type);
>   
>     /* _sigpoll */

Do we need to add some extra tests to validate that gdb can read these 
new fields?