Re: [PATCH] gdb.rocm/watchpoint-basic: add gfx1103 to XFAILs

On 7-Aug-2026 07:36PM, Simon Marchi wrote:

> As a subsequent comment, I wonder if, for these arches, instead of
> xfail-ing, it would be more useful to dispatch that dummy commit and
> then expect the watchpoint to work.

IMO, this would not trigger us if/when the KFD issue is resolved, so
the "list" won't go away.  Having the "list" removed has the benefit
of treating any failure from that point onward as a new one.

On 7-Aug-2026 10:58PM, Machado, Luis wrote:

> I think that'd makes sense. And if we want to make sure we still expose
> the KFD issue, we could run a quick check first (but not FAIL) and
> proceed to use the workaround if needed.

What would be this quick-check (without failures)?
How would it cover new architectures?
Or is it going to "fallback" in case of "any" failure?
Yet again, how would it trigger us when the problem is resolved?

-Shahab