Re: [PATCH] gdb: search local symbols before global symbols in completion
Oleg Tolmatcev <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACcXsZgLx0kcQvQbMX-xScwF-g-3r=bi8Pd=-ZAKn9fBwgVAQw@mail.gmail.com> |
пн, 3 авг. 2026 г. в 13:03, Andrew Burgess <[email protected]>: > > Oleg Tolmatcev <[email protected]> writes: > > > When symbol completion is performed from a selected frame, search the > > local blocks before scanning minimal symbols and global/static symbols. > > This makes completion prefer names that are visible in the current > > context, including local variables. > > --- > > gdb/symtab.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- > > It feels like this really needs a test in the gdb.dap/ directory. > > Thanks, > Andrew > > > > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/gdb/symtab.c b/gdb/symtab.c > > index 5d5076f2e77..85665bebdf4 100644 > > --- a/gdb/symtab.c > > +++ b/gdb/symtab.c > > @@ -5931,6 +5931,42 @@ default_collect_symbol_completion_matches_break_on > > > > lookup_name_info lookup_name (sym_text, name_match_type, true); > > > > + /* Search upwards from currently selected frame (so that we can > > + complete on local vars). Also catch fields of types defined in > > + this places which match our text string. Only complete on types > > + visible from current context. */ > > + > > + b = get_selected_block (); > > + surrounding_static_block = b == nullptr ? nullptr : b->static_block (); > > + surrounding_global_block = b == nullptr ? nullptr : b->global_block (); > > + if (surrounding_static_block != NULL) > > + while (b != surrounding_static_block) > > + { > > + QUIT; > > + > > + for (struct symbol *sym : block_iterator_range (b)) > > + { > > + if (code == TYPE_CODE_UNDEF) > > + { > > + completion_list_add_symbol (tracker, sym, lookup_name, > > + sym_text, word); > > + completion_list_add_fields (tracker, sym, lookup_name, > > + sym_text, word); > > + } > > + else if (sym->domain () == STRUCT_DOMAIN > > + && sym->type ()->code () == code) > > + completion_list_add_symbol (tracker, sym, lookup_name, > > + sym_text, word); > > + } > > + > > + /* Stop when we encounter an enclosing function. Do not stop for > > + non-inlined functions - the locals of the enclosing function > > + are in scope for a nested function. */ > > + if (b->function () != NULL && b->inlined_p ()) > > + break; > > + b = b->superblock (); > > + } > > + > > /* At this point scan through the misc symbol vectors and add each > > symbol you find to the list. Eventually we want to ignore > > anything that isn't a text symbol (everything else will be > > @@ -5974,42 +6010,6 @@ default_collect_symbol_completion_matches_break_on > > SEARCH_ALL_DOMAINS); > > } > > > > - /* Search upwards from currently selected frame (so that we can > > - complete on local vars). Also catch fields of types defined in > > - this places which match our text string. Only complete on types > > - visible from current context. */ > > - > > - b = get_selected_block (); > > - surrounding_static_block = b == nullptr ? nullptr : b->static_block (); > > - surrounding_global_block = b == nullptr ? nullptr : b->global_block (); > > - if (surrounding_static_block != NULL) > > - while (b != surrounding_static_block) > > - { > > - QUIT; > > - > > - for (struct symbol *sym : block_iterator_range (b)) > > - { > > - if (code == TYPE_CODE_UNDEF) > > - { > > - completion_list_add_symbol (tracker, sym, lookup_name, > > - sym_text, word); > > - completion_list_add_fields (tracker, sym, lookup_name, > > - sym_text, word); > > - } > > - else if (sym->domain () == STRUCT_DOMAIN > > - && sym->type ()->code () == code) > > - completion_list_add_symbol (tracker, sym, lookup_name, > > - sym_text, word); > > - } > > - > > - /* Stop when we encounter an enclosing function. Do not stop for > > - non-inlined functions - the locals of the enclosing function > > - are in scope for a nested function. */ > > - if (b->function () != NULL && b->inlined_p ()) > > - break; > > - b = b->superblock (); > > - } > > - > > /* Add fields from the file's types; symbols will be added below. */ > > > > if (code == TYPE_CODE_UNDEF) > > -- > > 2.55.0.windows.1 > I tried 3 times, but every time my test causes regressions on ARM. I don't know how to write a passing test. Is a test really necessary for this trivial patch that only changes the order of completion results? Oleg