Re: Recording negative information

Jon Schewe <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.genealogy.gramps.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thank you for the replies. This thread on Discourse is the one I was
thinking of. Custom Roles and Custom Events are reasonable ways to sort this out.

On Tue, 2021-11-02 at 03:15 +0000, Emyoulation--- via Gramps-users
wrote:
> There was this "Citation confidence level" discussion (with no
> resolution): 
> https://sourceforge.net/p/gramps/mailman/gramps-users/thread/1092345492.14888201.1546719305975%40mail.yahoo.com/#msg36509871
> 
> 
> There are several thread on the Discourse forum where various people
> share their methods to recording and flagging 'disproven' evidence. 
> 
> For example: 
> https://gramps.discourse.group/t/how-do-you-manage-your-research-contacts/453
> 
> 
> And there's been an extensive discussion on the Developer mail-list
> about how to expand citations. And part of that included marking
> disproven items. 
> 
> -Brian 
>  
>   On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 20:26, Jon Schewe<
> [email protected]
> > wrote:   I know this was discussed on the list sometime in the past
> year, but I can't seem to find it in my searches.
> What do people do to record negative information? I've got multiple
> sources of information about someone's birth date and eventually I
> figured out the right date based on records. I kind of want to
> remember that I discounted the other date(s) so that I don't add them
> in again.
> Jon  
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> 
> 



-- 
Gramps-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-users
https://gramps-project.org
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.