Re: Corruption causing Gramps to crash
Peter Flynn <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.genealogy.gramps.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | Silmaril Consultants |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 22/11/2021 13:31, Emyoulation--- via Gramps-users wrote: > Nice. Lots of citations in a such small section! > > With a quick read of the raw .gramps file, I thought .gramps files were XML, but looking at my own exports, they're a binary format. What are you using to read one? > I only noticed one thing that gave me immediate pause. In the > description for Event E13779 (a probate record), it starts with a > "less than" symbol (<). "< £125000" I always worry about whether > software will choke on a text value that starts with a piping > character. If the file /was/ XML, then the escaped < is safe because the parser will deal with it. It would then be up to the user to use suitable software that will understand the file format. But I share your misgivings if the file is non-XML and plaintext, because shell scripts may indeed misinterpret the character. I'm not sure what happens if you try to read a binary file with the standard shell scripting tools. Peter -- Gramps-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-users https://gramps-project.org