Re: ERMapper ECW License problematic

"Jan-Oliver Wagner" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gis.freegis
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thursday 21 September 2006 11:12, HeinzJ wrote:
> I think it is by law correct to use GPL/LGPL as a pattern for your own
> licence. They write it down very clearly "similar" and not in footnotes
> etc.

thats not really point I am worried about. If you combine ECW and
a (L)GPL software, there is simply a license violation, induced by
contradictory ECW license.

I wonder whether there are no such combinations out there - is
anyone aware of one?

Best

	Jan

-- 
Jan-Oliver Wagner: www.intevation.de/~jan  | GISpatcher: www.gispatcher.de
Kolab Konsortium : www.kolab-konsortium.de | Thuban    : thuban.intevation.org
Intevation GmbH  : www.intevation.de       | Kolab     : www.kolab.org
FreeGIS          : www.freegis.org         | GAV       : www.grass-verein.de
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.