Re: Call for review: RFC111: AI/LLM tool policy
Even Rouault via gdal-dev <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gis.gdal.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I've added an extra paragraph in https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/13880 using the feedback of the similar discussion that occurs in parallel for QGIS, mostly stating that the RFC is about how to handle LLM based contributions but not taking a final position if LLM code contributions are acceptable, to reflect that this is still a much debated topic. If no further comments, I'll submit that to vote soon Even Le 09/02/2026 à 02:15, Even Rouault via gdal-dev a écrit : > Hi, > > We are seeing a growing use of AI/LLM assisted contributions of > varying qualities. It is time to give us a framework (likely imperfect > but better than nothing) to handle this. Please > review https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/13880 > > Even > -- http://www.spatialys.com My software is free, but my time generally not. _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev