Re: Anyone has already forgotten the /vsicurl/ prefix?
Scott via gdal-dev <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gis.gdal.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Embarrassingly, I've caught myself looking into the documentation for /vsihttp/ on more than one occasion. It might be cool to have it, possibly with its own set of --co options. But, yeah, the new default action you outlined sounds good! Scott On 3/27/26 10:08, Even Rouault via gdal-dev wrote: > Hi, > > I suspect that almost every GDAL user, even the most experienced, has > made the mistake of typing "gdalinfo https://example.com/my.tif" instead > of "gdalinfo /vsicurl/https://example.com/my.tif". Both commands work, > but the first one triggers the HTTP pseudo-driver which downloads the > entire file into memory before passing it to the GeoTIFF driver, while > the second reads it in chunks. > > I would be inclined to modify the GDALOpen() logic with the following > tweak: if the passed filename starts with "http://" or "https://", > automatically prepend "/vsicurl/", unless the string has query > parameters. That restriction about not having query parameters is > because in most of the cases this is for dynamically generated resources > that don't support range requests. > > For users really wanting to go through the HTTP pseudo-driver, we'd > modify it to accept a "HTTP:" prefix before the URL or it would trigger > if using the "-if HTTP" argument of command line utilities (or > allowed_drivers = ["HTTP"] in the API) > > So this change wouldn't be fully backwards compatible, but I feel it > would still make more people happy than unhappy. > > Thoughts? > > Even >