Integrating AI assisted code review for PR in OSGeo/GDAL?
Even Rouault via gdal-dev <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gis.gdal.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I think it could be worth to have the *possibility* of requiring an AI assisted review for pull requests, directly available from our canonical repo. I've been occasionaly experimenting Gemini Code Assist and Copilot in my personal fork. Copilot had repeated failures a few weeks ago but seems to have been fixed recently, so I've more experience with /gemini review. I find it useful and it has spotted real issues, some of them would have probably went unnoticed during classic human review, and with an acceptable rate of false positives or debatable remarks. So my proposal would be to have the tool(s) enabled in OSGeo/GDAL repo, *on demand* (not sure if that's possible for Copilot. Is that a setting? Although I'm not trusting github enough to be sure if we want to increase our use of it. Gemini review is definitely on demand and an external github app we can disable in one click) for developers or reviewers that want to trigger them. I don't think having them to run systematically is a good idea, because some PRs are too trivial to get any benefit from them, and having them enabled systematically lead to noise as PR comments and notifications. I definitely don't think those tools should replace human review. AI tools are instructed to flatter your ego and will never say your PR is a bad idea, which a human reviewer will occasionally say. Or they lack the global picture, etc. I see them as additional tools on top of our CI instrumentation and human review. Anyone with experience in that area and thoughts? Even -- http://www.spatialys.com My software is free, but my time generally not. _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev